The Information Protection Life Cycle (IPLC) frames how information should be protected across three stages: acquire & assess, active use life, and disposition. The focus here is the “Secure” control category within the Active Use Life stage, emphasizing that protecting information assets must go beyond basic access control and instead implement confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA). Confidentiality depends not only on authorizing users but also ensuring the devices and applications handling sensitive information are hardened. Integrity requires preventing unauthorized tampering or modification. Availability requires keeping information ready for use, recognizing that DDoS and bot attacks commonly target availability.
Three primary techniques are highlighted for improving confidentiality and integrity: encryption, tokenization, and data masking. Encryption encodes data so it is unreadable without keys, and should be applied both at rest and in transit. While Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) can enforce whole-disk encryption, this is portrayed mainly as a compliance-oriented “last resort” for lost or stolen devices, offering limited protection against many other cyber risks. More effective approaches encrypt logical data elements and integrate centralized key management, policy controls, auditing, and connectors across systems. Strong integration with IAM is needed so encryption requirements can be driven by data classification, ownership, group membership, and user attributes.
Tokenization replaces sensitive values with random placeholders while keeping the real data in a secure external platform, reducing compliance scope and supporting format-preserving behavior for existing applications. Masking is described as an irreversible variant that keeps data realistic; static masking permanently desensitizes copied/exported datasets, while dynamic masking alters results at retrieval time so only authorized users see original values. Recommendations stress modern encrypted protocols (TLS 1.3, SSH/SFTP, HTTPS), avoiding proprietary cryptography, strengthening key management (including HSMs), considering secure enclaves for data-in-use, and using risk-based roadmaps to close capability gaps.
See All Locations
See All Locations